| Why Did NASA Use Two Pictures and Make One Photo Out of Them to Give to The American 'Taxpayers' as an Original 'Photo' of Mars???? Go Back to Page One to Understand How this Trick Photography was Used to Design the Photo and how Mary Sutherland Discovered it. |
| This is the Top Part of the Photo is the horizon that was Added to Mars photo to produce what we see below. However the One photo below is 2 photos made into one. See Photo Below. |
Now here is a possibility that one gentleman sees as to why the photo was doctored . And of course we need to give NASA the benefit of the
doubt in all fairness.
Below is a possibility,.
Hi Mary,
Maybe what they did was focus the camera on the farther away objects to get
them sharp, then took another picture immediately after that and refocused the
camera lens on the closer objects, so they would be sharp. Then they combined
only the near and far sharp elements from both photos together with a computer
so that the ENTIRE scene would be in sharp focus. Would/could they do that ?
Signed A.
G.M.
Mosaics (such as the large photos of Mars that NASA has been releasing) are by definition constituted of many smaller photos which are put
together into one large panoramic view. I'm not real sure about the camera they are using on Mars, but most cameras can not focus at all
distances at the same time. Therefore, objects which are more than a few feet away might be in sharp focus while objects that were very close to
the lens might be blurred (or smudged). While I am sure that the Mars camera is much better than anything I have ever used it seems that I would
need to know the camera specifics before calling a section of the mosaic a smudge. Time will tell.
CosmoStarMan
Click on this link ( www.space.com/marsrover/ ) then go to the mosaics in the 'Zoom In' section. Lots of interesting things in the photos but I
noticed on the first photo that they make a comment that the science team is curious about a dune shaped area that may possibly have an
armored top. It first refers to "Sleepy Hollow" area and then states that the interesting dune is to the right. I'm not sure if they mean in the right of
"Sleepy Hollow" or on the right side of the mosaic.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Mary,
What do I think? Hmmm...The smudges really do look suspicious, don't they! I'm inclined to believe that they are signs of "doctoring". As far as the
artificial looking "tan line" goes though, I'd be reluctant to come to a firm conclusion. When in the digital arena and working with Photoshop and
such, strange artifacts sometimes surface. The "sun cruisers" of a while back are an example. We COULD have two images pasted together, but
I wouldn't rule out the "digital artifact" gremlin either
All the best
B. M.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Very intersting,
I remember clearly a previous lander showing the sky as blue. I have a very poor copy and no link. This same picture also shows what looks like
plantlife.
Speaking of which did you happen to see the ESA photo of Mars taken at 5.5 mil klms? There is an awful lot of green on it and a little blue. I wrote
and asked if this was a true colour photogragh and got an almost instant response that it was true colour but when I wrote and asked re the green
and blue - get no reply. I've asked this question now twice over the last month and no response so I'm sure we are not being told the truth!
Cheers
Jeff from the UK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello: words of praise!
I caught this neat work of yours off Kents page.
No need at all to respond to this, you are too busy and not needed.
Bear w/ me as all I am saying actually is THANX!!!!
OK, DARN GOOD you all involved! A great catch Mary.
Indeed, I also swiftly downloaded the initial big image from Mars.
As you did, I worked it over on several levels w/ imaging programs. I saw the anomalies, smudge spots... but I thought to myself "Jim you are a
country bumpkin. A curious amateur. How do you know anything about this" ? But, somewhere, a dim bulb DID flicker and registed that this image
isn't right... just something about it.... (They wouldnt would they..Naw....but......)
So many people were joyous to be on Mars again, I felt why rain on the parade, who'd listen to a bumpkin anyway....
(I mentally noted ... "this whole Mars thing is an exercise in deception"...geez, an odd thought.) I left the pic feeling non-pulsed, sad, earlier I had
true excitement. Now, the feeling of having been lied to.... (a those b...., why do I try sort of feeling).
But you changed that. Eureka !! Presto ! God bless all of you, the excitement is back in a different form. I am not mad after all or seeing things.
Thank you for sharing !
Thank you, thank you, thank you !!!!
Seeing this great stuff from you really hit home. YOU did it, you pinned it down to a T !
Not what I'd hoped for as per a new Martial adventure, but Malin-Mars-Nasa have set out a good game nonetheless w/ there efforts to decieve
So....
Do they run rampant w/ their tawdry shams? All perpetrated on taxpayer dollars or get called on the carpet ? I say call their bluff! Just keep up the
great work Mary and crew ! I bet we are just getting started on a very long and tricky road. There will more chances to expose the NASA trickery yet
coming. You are not alone.
Sincerely, James Keating
http://www.jamesakeating.com/northwestquest.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've contacted & passed on your links to alot of folks about your Mars pages. Attatched is a closer look at the hazy martian mountains . I also sent
some questions to NASA but with the thousands of e-mail they are receiving I doubt I will get a response anytime this century . A press conference
on CNN yesterday NASAwas asked about the whiterocks in the image & they responded saying they were aware of them and that may be one of
the studies they will send the rover to investigate closer .The marks you have pointed out as possible footprints NASA states they are drift marks
from high winds / dust devils .
Linda Moore
Thanks Linda.. The work you have put into this is remarkable. It is determination such as this that keeps the 'politician..or in this case 'NASAn '
honest... At least they are having to work their heads to come up with answers. The people are not buying their stories anymore. We have woken
from the 'deep sleep' NASA!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nasa, says the big smudges, are caused by the airbags, bouncing around, numorous times , til it comes to a stop. B
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Mary,
I Emailed Jim two days ago to have him take a look at the photo posted on your site and have it checked out with the Mars experts he knows at
NASA . I Haven't heard back yet. He works as a science writer for UPI now. He answers easy
requests quickly. This may be a hard one because it is new material that he is unfamiliar with. As soon as he answers me I'll let everybody here
know what he said.
Art
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OOPS...Now What Have We Found??? CHECK OUT THE FOOTPRINTS!
Let's take another look at those shadows!
I had another look at the image and found something rather strange. Just in front of the larger rock you'll see two small objects with their
shadows pointing towards each other and totally in the wrong direction according to the rest of the photo! You'll also see image overlapping
which I guess is caused by poor alignment during processing.
The shadows though don't make sense!! Jeff
Good work on the shadows ,friends. There seems to be at least three light sources. I have forwarded a cropped image of footprints from the
official JPL feed from the first 24 hours. Note the small blue rock in the center of the two bigger footprints-it has brown dirt on the TOP of it. This
was caused by a booted foot using this rock as a 'pivot',to keep from making tracks(didnt work). You can see where the deeper impression ,the
clearer one ,is from weight transfer to a single foot ,as the person reboarded the buggy or whatever made the striated, wide tire treadmark, visible
right next to these prints. illumedi
Jeff,
These are cropped from the official JPL panorama of Mars. The photos have been slightly brightened to mitigate the contrast,but are otherwise
lifted directly from the camera feed on their site.
There are three clear footprints in the lower right photo, of two different sizes.These appear to be next to a depression,with striations,that was
likely made by an arriving dune buggy or similar vehicle. I thought ,at first ,that the depression was possibly made by lander's airbags ,as it rolled
to a stop,but I believe this misleading impression was intentional.The airbags would have made a series of these marks ,or at least several of the
same shape ,since they are mounted on the lander in groups on each side.
The footprints are clear ,and the prints of the matching set are of the exact same size. There are two smaller prints-a little distance apart ,facing
the lander. There is another, larger one,in the same area (possibly overlapping another of the same size ,facing away from the lander) with clear
indentations from the sole of the boot/shoe.
From the panorama,it is also evident that there is at least a rudimentary atmosphere in these pictures-there are geographical features in the
distance ,visible through a hazy ,tinted mist.The hazy appearance is caused by particulates suspended in an atmosphere dense enough to hold
them up.
It appears to me ,Jeff ,that we are being tricked. This looks suspiciously like EARTH,maybe in the southwestern USA.
Shadow
Hi Shadow...You know...That feeling that these shots are coming right out of the southwest have been tugging at me as well.
I even have been checking out the Chaco Canyon area as a possibility, knowing that NASA has been doing a lot of infrared aerial photos of that
area. Mary
Linda sent the below photo in to assist others in understanding Jeff's above photo.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody seems to see that one!
Look on the lower right corner of photo
Michel Bergeron
It also looks to me that there is a footprint coming back ..which can be send running almost parallel to the other print.
One going forward and another coming back.? sutherland
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Going Back to my discovery of the added skyline to the terrain . 2 Pictures made into One. While I was playing around with the photo editor, I
embossed the photo to see what I would get. Well as you see a strange line just below the skyline and above the terrain.. I would think this is
where they tried to blend the skyline and the terrain together by brushing.
Mary,
I am pleased to see you have the crops from the lower corner of the Spirit panorama on your site now.
Note the 'butterfly' shaped prints that overlap,and the small blue rock in the center, with soil on top that was used for a pivot. These are very clearly
visible now ,in your pics.
Note the tread mark from the 'sand buggy' or such is now very visible ,to the right of the 'butterfly' bootprints.It has two clear striations(marks from
tread) visible in the track,that pass through the center of it.
Shadow
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Do You Think?
Have you seen the tampering done by putting photo in your photo editing program. Try it. Let us know what you have discovered. Give us your
thoughts on this. Have NASA give us what we (the taxpayers) are paying them for! Rememer it is "our" money they are using.. Make them
accountable by forcing them into showing us the 'REAL' pictures coming back from Mars...if.. at all.. they are from Mars
Contact US Here...Let your voice be Heard
doubt in all fairness.
Below is a possibility,.
Hi Mary,
Maybe what they did was focus the camera on the farther away objects to get
them sharp, then took another picture immediately after that and refocused the
camera lens on the closer objects, so they would be sharp. Then they combined
only the near and far sharp elements from both photos together with a computer
so that the ENTIRE scene would be in sharp focus. Would/could they do that ?
Signed A.
G.M.
Mosaics (such as the large photos of Mars that NASA has been releasing) are by definition constituted of many smaller photos which are put
together into one large panoramic view. I'm not real sure about the camera they are using on Mars, but most cameras can not focus at all
distances at the same time. Therefore, objects which are more than a few feet away might be in sharp focus while objects that were very close to
the lens might be blurred (or smudged). While I am sure that the Mars camera is much better than anything I have ever used it seems that I would
need to know the camera specifics before calling a section of the mosaic a smudge. Time will tell.
CosmoStarMan
Click on this link ( www.space.com/marsrover/ ) then go to the mosaics in the 'Zoom In' section. Lots of interesting things in the photos but I
noticed on the first photo that they make a comment that the science team is curious about a dune shaped area that may possibly have an
armored top. It first refers to "Sleepy Hollow" area and then states that the interesting dune is to the right. I'm not sure if they mean in the right of
"Sleepy Hollow" or on the right side of the mosaic.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Mary,
What do I think? Hmmm...The smudges really do look suspicious, don't they! I'm inclined to believe that they are signs of "doctoring". As far as the
artificial looking "tan line" goes though, I'd be reluctant to come to a firm conclusion. When in the digital arena and working with Photoshop and
such, strange artifacts sometimes surface. The "sun cruisers" of a while back are an example. We COULD have two images pasted together, but
I wouldn't rule out the "digital artifact" gremlin either
All the best
B. M.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Very intersting,
I remember clearly a previous lander showing the sky as blue. I have a very poor copy and no link. This same picture also shows what looks like
plantlife.
Speaking of which did you happen to see the ESA photo of Mars taken at 5.5 mil klms? There is an awful lot of green on it and a little blue. I wrote
and asked if this was a true colour photogragh and got an almost instant response that it was true colour but when I wrote and asked re the green
and blue - get no reply. I've asked this question now twice over the last month and no response so I'm sure we are not being told the truth!
Cheers
Jeff from the UK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello: words of praise!
I caught this neat work of yours off Kents page.
No need at all to respond to this, you are too busy and not needed.
Bear w/ me as all I am saying actually is THANX!!!!
OK, DARN GOOD you all involved! A great catch Mary.
Indeed, I also swiftly downloaded the initial big image from Mars.
As you did, I worked it over on several levels w/ imaging programs. I saw the anomalies, smudge spots... but I thought to myself "Jim you are a
country bumpkin. A curious amateur. How do you know anything about this" ? But, somewhere, a dim bulb DID flicker and registed that this image
isn't right... just something about it.... (They wouldnt would they..Naw....but......)
So many people were joyous to be on Mars again, I felt why rain on the parade, who'd listen to a bumpkin anyway....
(I mentally noted ... "this whole Mars thing is an exercise in deception"...geez, an odd thought.) I left the pic feeling non-pulsed, sad, earlier I had
true excitement. Now, the feeling of having been lied to.... (a those b...., why do I try sort of feeling).
But you changed that. Eureka !! Presto ! God bless all of you, the excitement is back in a different form. I am not mad after all or seeing things.
Thank you for sharing !
Thank you, thank you, thank you !!!!
Seeing this great stuff from you really hit home. YOU did it, you pinned it down to a T !
Not what I'd hoped for as per a new Martial adventure, but Malin-Mars-Nasa have set out a good game nonetheless w/ there efforts to decieve
So....
Do they run rampant w/ their tawdry shams? All perpetrated on taxpayer dollars or get called on the carpet ? I say call their bluff! Just keep up the
great work Mary and crew ! I bet we are just getting started on a very long and tricky road. There will more chances to expose the NASA trickery yet
coming. You are not alone.
Sincerely, James Keating
http://www.jamesakeating.com/northwestquest.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've contacted & passed on your links to alot of folks about your Mars pages. Attatched is a closer look at the hazy martian mountains . I also sent
some questions to NASA but with the thousands of e-mail they are receiving I doubt I will get a response anytime this century . A press conference
on CNN yesterday NASAwas asked about the whiterocks in the image & they responded saying they were aware of them and that may be one of
the studies they will send the rover to investigate closer .The marks you have pointed out as possible footprints NASA states they are drift marks
from high winds / dust devils .
Linda Moore
Thanks Linda.. The work you have put into this is remarkable. It is determination such as this that keeps the 'politician..or in this case 'NASAn '
honest... At least they are having to work their heads to come up with answers. The people are not buying their stories anymore. We have woken
from the 'deep sleep' NASA!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nasa, says the big smudges, are caused by the airbags, bouncing around, numorous times , til it comes to a stop. B
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Mary,
I Emailed Jim two days ago to have him take a look at the photo posted on your site and have it checked out with the Mars experts he knows at
NASA . I Haven't heard back yet. He works as a science writer for UPI now. He answers easy
requests quickly. This may be a hard one because it is new material that he is unfamiliar with. As soon as he answers me I'll let everybody here
know what he said.
Art
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OOPS...Now What Have We Found??? CHECK OUT THE FOOTPRINTS!
Let's take another look at those shadows!
I had another look at the image and found something rather strange. Just in front of the larger rock you'll see two small objects with their
shadows pointing towards each other and totally in the wrong direction according to the rest of the photo! You'll also see image overlapping
which I guess is caused by poor alignment during processing.
The shadows though don't make sense!! Jeff
Good work on the shadows ,friends. There seems to be at least three light sources. I have forwarded a cropped image of footprints from the
official JPL feed from the first 24 hours. Note the small blue rock in the center of the two bigger footprints-it has brown dirt on the TOP of it. This
was caused by a booted foot using this rock as a 'pivot',to keep from making tracks(didnt work). You can see where the deeper impression ,the
clearer one ,is from weight transfer to a single foot ,as the person reboarded the buggy or whatever made the striated, wide tire treadmark, visible
right next to these prints. illumedi
Jeff,
These are cropped from the official JPL panorama of Mars. The photos have been slightly brightened to mitigate the contrast,but are otherwise
lifted directly from the camera feed on their site.
There are three clear footprints in the lower right photo, of two different sizes.These appear to be next to a depression,with striations,that was
likely made by an arriving dune buggy or similar vehicle. I thought ,at first ,that the depression was possibly made by lander's airbags ,as it rolled
to a stop,but I believe this misleading impression was intentional.The airbags would have made a series of these marks ,or at least several of the
same shape ,since they are mounted on the lander in groups on each side.
The footprints are clear ,and the prints of the matching set are of the exact same size. There are two smaller prints-a little distance apart ,facing
the lander. There is another, larger one,in the same area (possibly overlapping another of the same size ,facing away from the lander) with clear
indentations from the sole of the boot/shoe.
From the panorama,it is also evident that there is at least a rudimentary atmosphere in these pictures-there are geographical features in the
distance ,visible through a hazy ,tinted mist.The hazy appearance is caused by particulates suspended in an atmosphere dense enough to hold
them up.
It appears to me ,Jeff ,that we are being tricked. This looks suspiciously like EARTH,maybe in the southwestern USA.
Shadow
Hi Shadow...You know...That feeling that these shots are coming right out of the southwest have been tugging at me as well.
I even have been checking out the Chaco Canyon area as a possibility, knowing that NASA has been doing a lot of infrared aerial photos of that
area. Mary
Linda sent the below photo in to assist others in understanding Jeff's above photo.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody seems to see that one!
Look on the lower right corner of photo
Michel Bergeron
It also looks to me that there is a footprint coming back ..which can be send running almost parallel to the other print.
One going forward and another coming back.? sutherland
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Going Back to my discovery of the added skyline to the terrain . 2 Pictures made into One. While I was playing around with the photo editor, I
embossed the photo to see what I would get. Well as you see a strange line just below the skyline and above the terrain.. I would think this is
where they tried to blend the skyline and the terrain together by brushing.
Mary,
I am pleased to see you have the crops from the lower corner of the Spirit panorama on your site now.
Note the 'butterfly' shaped prints that overlap,and the small blue rock in the center, with soil on top that was used for a pivot. These are very clearly
visible now ,in your pics.
Note the tread mark from the 'sand buggy' or such is now very visible ,to the right of the 'butterfly' bootprints.It has two clear striations(marks from
tread) visible in the track,that pass through the center of it.
Shadow
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Do You Think?
Have you seen the tampering done by putting photo in your photo editing program. Try it. Let us know what you have discovered. Give us your
thoughts on this. Have NASA give us what we (the taxpayers) are paying them for! Rememer it is "our" money they are using.. Make them
accountable by forcing them into showing us the 'REAL' pictures coming back from Mars...if.. at all.. they are from Mars
Contact US Here...Let your voice be Heard
| Artificial Structures Found on Mars If this is on the surface..what is going on in the interior of Mars/? CLICK HERE TO READ REPORT |
| THINGS HAVEN'T CHANGED MUCH FROM WHAT NASA WAS REPORTING IN 2002. SAME OL' STORIES..JUST WITH A DIFFERENT TWIST. SEE BACK REPORTS AND PHOTOS I HAVE ON THIS SITE CLICK HERE |
| B.U.F.O.Research Center Researching the Mysteries of UFOs, Paranormal and Ancient Man Copyrite 2003 All Rights Reserved 532 N. Pine Street Burlington, WI 53105 CONTACT US 262-767-1116 "We Are Here For You!" Back to Mars Home Page |
| Mary Sutherland Meet Mary Sutherland BUFO RADIO Home Page |