| The below photo is totally amazing in the fact not only is there a great orb there and it seems that Jolene is in some sort of beam of light...BUT the large brilliant light that the beam radiates from should not be there! All that is behind the gate that Jolene is leaning up against is a dark deserted utility road..No lights back there what-so-ever. Not only is that strange..but as large and brilliant as that light was..there was absolutely no one in the group that saw this light. Luckily for us the camera did pick it up. Could this be the very thing that is creating the portal in this particular spot. More photos coming today.. EAGLE LAKE...Copyright 2-1-05 @Mary Sutherland |
| Following are some photos we took of this same area. As you will see ....NO LIGHT! Now the question is..where did the light come from. Is it intra-dimensional - Or is a cloaked UFO - Or is it an Angelic Being? |
burlingtonnews@yahoo.com 2/4/2005 2:42:37 AM
I know that a few of you in here know a little of analyzing photos. The photo in http://www.burlingtonnews.net/ufooverburlington14
has me stumped. Any ideas about the light photographed. We were looking right at it, and never saw it.
But look how large and brilliant it is. Could it be an angelic presense.. or is it inter-dimensional or is it UFO??????
mary
From: Dr."Brooks Agnew
Date: Fri Feb 4, 2005 7:30 am
Subject: Re: [ancientmysteriesms] Mary requests help
I took a night ;picture of an old church one time. I thought I would do a time-elapsed shot. i set it up and opened the shutter for about 30 seconds, hoping to get a very clear shot of the
stained glass with a dim light behind it from inside the church. When I developed the film, there was a huge bright light above the church, like a quasar. There was no light at this sight.
No street light, no security light...nothing. I went back there to check it out another night. True, there was no light. To this day I don;t know where that light came from.
I believE you are right, Mary. There is cumulative energy vibrating at the right wavelength, but pulsing so fast...or slow...that our minds don't see it. The film can't miss it though. Maybe we
need to learn how to slow our minds down, or speed them up, so we can see these forces around us. One thing's for sure. That appearance is one of light. That is a good thing. There
must be a good reason why so many light beings are coming to your neighborhood. Maybe they know you have affected the universe, or you are about to. They want to be
around when it happens.
Dr. Brooks Agnew
arkofamillionyears.com
--------------------------------------
Hi Mary,
There is no logical explanation for the anomalous brilliant light in the top right. As for the spherical image above her head, it appears to be a double image as the sphere is not spherical
but slightly extended. Also the photo shows a double image, as with a
standard film frame. (Mary's Note: We were using 'Digitial' ) But it would be easier to view a much larger image. (Sent Philip the orginal)
Photography has the ability to pick up (extra)dimensional images the the human retina cannot. Perhaps it is to do with the vibratory frequency of retinal imaging to the brain?
I have a few photos of anomalous happenings on photos that are clearly other-dimensional to the Earth plain.
Kind regards, Philip Dawes
----------------------------------------
Margaret
Hi Mary,
Is there anything that draws you to those particular spots to take photos? The one that looks like a double exposure is fascinating. It seems like you have a dimensional photo, (entered
into time/space simultaneous framework), since you seem to have got a photo of a glitch in time and space.
Margaret
Robert Michaels
Date: Thu Feb 3, 2005 2:27 pm
Subject: Re: [abductionbuddies] UFO or Angelic Being??
That's what I was wondering about too, Margaret and Mary. Thats why I was wondering if you had a day-time photo. Please, though, don't make a special trip up wherever just for me. I
know you have other, more pressing and imoprtant things to do.
Robert
Mary Sutherland <burlingtonnews@yahoo.com> wrote:
yes, you guessed it!
There is a time/space distortion there at this particular place. Someone in the area told me about it this summer.
We went up there and have been getting great shots such as this every since. it is a wonderful place..but very mysterious!
Mary
-----------------------------------------------
Hi Mary,
Many thanks. A splendid image size. I save it to my desktop and enlarged it to 1600%. The pixelation of the light source in the top right appears to be much finer than the rest. Also the
spherical object, although not really spherical; it is slightly iregular, and has a ring of what seems to be fire on its perimeter. It is impossible to determine what it is.
KInd regards,
Philip
-------------------------
Hi Philip
I remembered seeing that light once before in the same area...although not distinct as the one I earlier sent you.
Terri caught it as she climbed over that gate...Just at the very outside edge of the camera as it went off accidentaly.
Then also it seems that it presented a light from its source on the second photo, after she was back over the fence.
These two photos are of 12-23-05.
NOW..Iam 'thinking' this may be why we get the time/space distortion shots around this gate.
BUT..is the light a 'result' of the times/space distortion or portal...or is IT the Portal???? Photos taken by Terri on her digital camera
Mary
---------------------------
Thanks Philip,
I will add this comment to that site.
I should have mentioned...we were using a digital camera to shoot these photos...so we could not have had a double image.
Brooks says that a digital only 'picks up' the photon there. Without the light photon..no picture. I hope I quoted you right on this Brooks. Mary
-----------------------------
Dr. Brooks Agnew"
That's true Mary. Photographic film is sensitive to all kinds of wavelengths, even x-rays and heat. Those we cannot see. Digital CCD's are typically electronically filtered to respond only to
limited wavelengths. There are some out there that will pick up infrared, ultraviolet, and even radio waves, but they are not available at Walmart. The human eye, however is blind to
out-of-phase light. We cannot tell a TV screen is blinking at 40 cycles per second, because the phosphor dope behind the glass retains the electrons from the color guns for a fraction of
a second. A camera will pick up the blinking action. A computer CRT blinks at 70 cycles per second.
But, what if an energy was out of phase with our sensors or blinking at such a rate that our eyes cannot accumulate it into an image? Then the CCD would catch it and save it. Thus, Mary
is able to capture lights in the sky when no eye saw a light.
Brooks
arkofamillionyears.com
-----------------------------
Thank you so much for that explanation. It really helps and I will put that on the site. We are in a phase now that so many people 'want' to believe, but if we can't show them some rational
explanation we will lose them , which will be a tragedy in itself. Raymond Fowler, one of the fathers of ufology sent me this today. I hope we can all understand the importance of it and
work with science in the search for intra-dimensional possibilities concerning UFO phenomenon. Here is what he sent me:
February 3, 2005 -- When the Journal of the British Interplanetary Society prints a feature article by credible scientists reporting that UFOs are in all probability real and deserve serious
scientific study in light of the "New Physics" of the Quantum Kind, then it is time for science to do so. The space society, founded 72 years ago in 1933, is composed of prominent space
and rocket scientists, astronomers and astrophysicists, and other science professionals.
The feature article, "Inflation-Theory: Implications for Extraterrestrial Visitations," appears in the current BIS "Scientific Space Journal" on pages 43-50, and was brought to S.P.A.C.E.'s
attention through a feature article on the SPACE.com website by its Senior Editor Leonard David in "ET Visitors: Scientists See High Likelihood."
The article's authors are astrophysicist Bernard Haisch (director-California Institute for Physics and Astrophysics and scientific editor-Astrophysical Journal"), and three physicist
well-known in Ufology: James Dearoff (Oregon State University professor and formerly researcher at the National Center for Atmospheric Research), Harold Puthoff (director-Institute for
Advanced Studies in Austin, Texas) and Bruce Maccabbee (prominent for his research into UFO photos, films and videos).
They urge scentists to study "high quality" UFO close encounter reports and to re-examine "the ET hypothesis in light of the new physics." In doing so, the authors contend that scientists
may very well find "some genuine ET signature within the data." They also note the discovery by Australian astronomers last year that the Earth is embedded within a huge "galactic
habitable zone" in our Milky Way Galaxy and that "our world is immersed in a much larger extraterrestrial civilization," writes Leonard David on Space.com,
and that "given a billion years advanced physics, might not buzzing around the galaxy be possible?"
The distinct probablities that "other dimensions (with) habitable universes adjacent to our own" actually exist, David writes of the BIS Journal report, makes UFO visitations distinctly
possible if not very likely probable. This is "somewhat of a breakthrough," writes Haisch in the BIS Journal article. A new book by poplar theoretrical physicist Dr. Michio Kaku, "Parallel
Worlds" features the latest New Physics findings and spectulations.
I know that a few of you in here know a little of analyzing photos. The photo in http://www.burlingtonnews.net/ufooverburlington14
has me stumped. Any ideas about the light photographed. We were looking right at it, and never saw it.
But look how large and brilliant it is. Could it be an angelic presense.. or is it inter-dimensional or is it UFO??????
mary
From: Dr."Brooks Agnew
Date: Fri Feb 4, 2005 7:30 am
Subject: Re: [ancientmysteriesms] Mary requests help
I took a night ;picture of an old church one time. I thought I would do a time-elapsed shot. i set it up and opened the shutter for about 30 seconds, hoping to get a very clear shot of the
stained glass with a dim light behind it from inside the church. When I developed the film, there was a huge bright light above the church, like a quasar. There was no light at this sight.
No street light, no security light...nothing. I went back there to check it out another night. True, there was no light. To this day I don;t know where that light came from.
I believE you are right, Mary. There is cumulative energy vibrating at the right wavelength, but pulsing so fast...or slow...that our minds don't see it. The film can't miss it though. Maybe we
need to learn how to slow our minds down, or speed them up, so we can see these forces around us. One thing's for sure. That appearance is one of light. That is a good thing. There
must be a good reason why so many light beings are coming to your neighborhood. Maybe they know you have affected the universe, or you are about to. They want to be
around when it happens.
Dr. Brooks Agnew
arkofamillionyears.com
--------------------------------------
Hi Mary,
There is no logical explanation for the anomalous brilliant light in the top right. As for the spherical image above her head, it appears to be a double image as the sphere is not spherical
but slightly extended. Also the photo shows a double image, as with a
standard film frame. (Mary's Note: We were using 'Digitial' ) But it would be easier to view a much larger image. (Sent Philip the orginal)
Photography has the ability to pick up (extra)dimensional images the the human retina cannot. Perhaps it is to do with the vibratory frequency of retinal imaging to the brain?
I have a few photos of anomalous happenings on photos that are clearly other-dimensional to the Earth plain.
Kind regards, Philip Dawes
----------------------------------------
Margaret
Hi Mary,
Is there anything that draws you to those particular spots to take photos? The one that looks like a double exposure is fascinating. It seems like you have a dimensional photo, (entered
into time/space simultaneous framework), since you seem to have got a photo of a glitch in time and space.
Margaret
Robert Michaels
Date: Thu Feb 3, 2005 2:27 pm
Subject: Re: [abductionbuddies] UFO or Angelic Being??
That's what I was wondering about too, Margaret and Mary. Thats why I was wondering if you had a day-time photo. Please, though, don't make a special trip up wherever just for me. I
know you have other, more pressing and imoprtant things to do.
Robert
Mary Sutherland <burlingtonnews@yahoo.com> wrote:
yes, you guessed it!
There is a time/space distortion there at this particular place. Someone in the area told me about it this summer.
We went up there and have been getting great shots such as this every since. it is a wonderful place..but very mysterious!
Mary
-----------------------------------------------
Hi Mary,
Many thanks. A splendid image size. I save it to my desktop and enlarged it to 1600%. The pixelation of the light source in the top right appears to be much finer than the rest. Also the
spherical object, although not really spherical; it is slightly iregular, and has a ring of what seems to be fire on its perimeter. It is impossible to determine what it is.
KInd regards,
Philip
-------------------------
Hi Philip
I remembered seeing that light once before in the same area...although not distinct as the one I earlier sent you.
Terri caught it as she climbed over that gate...Just at the very outside edge of the camera as it went off accidentaly.
Then also it seems that it presented a light from its source on the second photo, after she was back over the fence.
These two photos are of 12-23-05.
NOW..Iam 'thinking' this may be why we get the time/space distortion shots around this gate.
BUT..is the light a 'result' of the times/space distortion or portal...or is IT the Portal???? Photos taken by Terri on her digital camera
Mary
---------------------------
Thanks Philip,
I will add this comment to that site.
I should have mentioned...we were using a digital camera to shoot these photos...so we could not have had a double image.
Brooks says that a digital only 'picks up' the photon there. Without the light photon..no picture. I hope I quoted you right on this Brooks. Mary
-----------------------------
Dr. Brooks Agnew"
That's true Mary. Photographic film is sensitive to all kinds of wavelengths, even x-rays and heat. Those we cannot see. Digital CCD's are typically electronically filtered to respond only to
limited wavelengths. There are some out there that will pick up infrared, ultraviolet, and even radio waves, but they are not available at Walmart. The human eye, however is blind to
out-of-phase light. We cannot tell a TV screen is blinking at 40 cycles per second, because the phosphor dope behind the glass retains the electrons from the color guns for a fraction of
a second. A camera will pick up the blinking action. A computer CRT blinks at 70 cycles per second.
But, what if an energy was out of phase with our sensors or blinking at such a rate that our eyes cannot accumulate it into an image? Then the CCD would catch it and save it. Thus, Mary
is able to capture lights in the sky when no eye saw a light.
Brooks
arkofamillionyears.com
-----------------------------
Thank you so much for that explanation. It really helps and I will put that on the site. We are in a phase now that so many people 'want' to believe, but if we can't show them some rational
explanation we will lose them , which will be a tragedy in itself. Raymond Fowler, one of the fathers of ufology sent me this today. I hope we can all understand the importance of it and
work with science in the search for intra-dimensional possibilities concerning UFO phenomenon. Here is what he sent me:
February 3, 2005 -- When the Journal of the British Interplanetary Society prints a feature article by credible scientists reporting that UFOs are in all probability real and deserve serious
scientific study in light of the "New Physics" of the Quantum Kind, then it is time for science to do so. The space society, founded 72 years ago in 1933, is composed of prominent space
and rocket scientists, astronomers and astrophysicists, and other science professionals.
The feature article, "Inflation-Theory: Implications for Extraterrestrial Visitations," appears in the current BIS "Scientific Space Journal" on pages 43-50, and was brought to S.P.A.C.E.'s
attention through a feature article on the SPACE.com website by its Senior Editor Leonard David in "ET Visitors: Scientists See High Likelihood."
The article's authors are astrophysicist Bernard Haisch (director-California Institute for Physics and Astrophysics and scientific editor-Astrophysical Journal"), and three physicist
well-known in Ufology: James Dearoff (Oregon State University professor and formerly researcher at the National Center for Atmospheric Research), Harold Puthoff (director-Institute for
Advanced Studies in Austin, Texas) and Bruce Maccabbee (prominent for his research into UFO photos, films and videos).
They urge scentists to study "high quality" UFO close encounter reports and to re-examine "the ET hypothesis in light of the new physics." In doing so, the authors contend that scientists
may very well find "some genuine ET signature within the data." They also note the discovery by Australian astronomers last year that the Earth is embedded within a huge "galactic
habitable zone" in our Milky Way Galaxy and that "our world is immersed in a much larger extraterrestrial civilization," writes Leonard David on Space.com,
and that "given a billion years advanced physics, might not buzzing around the galaxy be possible?"
The distinct probablities that "other dimensions (with) habitable universes adjacent to our own" actually exist, David writes of the BIS Journal report, makes UFO visitations distinctly
possible if not very likely probable. This is "somewhat of a breakthrough," writes Haisch in the BIS Journal article. A new book by poplar theoretrical physicist Dr. Michio Kaku, "Parallel
Worlds" features the latest New Physics findings and spectulations.
The photo to the left is a shot that Terri was able to get on her digital camera, as she was
climbing over the gate. Her camera shot off up into the sky..fortunately for us
Photo taken 12-23-04
At first we put this photo aside..until we got the photo in from the other night. Now we
realize there is a connection to this light and the intra-dimensional portal next to the gate
at Eagle Lake. What the connection is ..as of yet...we do not know.
.
As soon as Terri climbed over the gate she 'immediately' shot a photo of Cheryl..notice the
rays of the brilliant light can be seen coming from the top left side of the photo..in the
same location as the light photo above it.
climbing over the gate. Her camera shot off up into the sky..fortunately for us
Photo taken 12-23-04
At first we put this photo aside..until we got the photo in from the other night. Now we
realize there is a connection to this light and the intra-dimensional portal next to the gate
at Eagle Lake. What the connection is ..as of yet...we do not know.
.
As soon as Terri climbed over the gate she 'immediately' shot a photo of Cheryl..notice the
rays of the brilliant light can be seen coming from the top left side of the photo..in the
same location as the light photo above it.
Understanding the Paranormal and Mysteries
Giants Among Us
Brad and Mary Sutherland
Giants Among Us
Brad and Mary Sutherland
BURLINGTON HAUNTED
TOURS
BURLINGTON SACRED
SITE and MOUND TOURS
BURLINGTON HISTORICAL
TOURS
FAIRY AND MYSTICAL
TOURS
iN SEARCH OF BIGFOOT
TOURS
JOIN US ON FACEBOOK
GROUP
Photographing and
Investigating the Invisible
World
BURLINGTON TOURS
Brad and Mary Sutherland
248 Carver Street
Winslow, Illinois 61089
815 367 1006
Paranormal
Phase-shifting & Portals
Phase shifting Photos
Invisibility
Portals
Portals 2
Portals 3
Altered Realities
Altered Realities 2
Vortices
Vortices 2
Vortices 3
HOME
TOURS
BURLINGTON SACRED
SITE and MOUND TOURS
BURLINGTON HISTORICAL
TOURS
FAIRY AND MYSTICAL
TOURS
iN SEARCH OF BIGFOOT
TOURS
JOIN US ON FACEBOOK
GROUP
Photographing and
Investigating the Invisible
World
BURLINGTON TOURS
Brad and Mary Sutherland
248 Carver Street
Winslow, Illinois 61089
815 367 1006
Paranormal
Phase-shifting & Portals
Phase shifting Photos
Invisibility
Portals
Portals 2
Portals 3
Altered Realities
Altered Realities 2
Vortices
Vortices 2
Vortices 3
HOME
| Science no longer identifies reality with the physical universe, for mind and consciousness belong to the unseen world. Sir Arthur Eddington |
| Portals...Gateways to the Multi-Dimensional Worlds 19.99 120 pages Full Color Portals- Gateways to the Multi-Dimensional Worlds Believe in the Magic Series In reading my book, ‘Portals- Gateways to the Multi-Dimensional Worlds’ and my series ‘Believe in the Magic’, I assure you, that you will not be disappointed. Quite the opposite; this book and upcoming series offer to the reader a unique understanding of ‘All that Is!’ Spread throughout its pages, are photos my husband Brad and I have taken through the years of the invisible worlds, filled with multiple selves, faeries, trolls, UFOs, angels and more. This book promises you not only ‘understanding’ but ‘photographic proof’ that Multi-dimensional realities do exist! When you understand the workings of these multi-dimensional levels, you will then appreciate not only the wonders of the multi-universe, but the ‘magic that lie within’… ‘Portals- Gateways to the Multi-Dimensional Worlds’ will teach you to not only communicate with the multi-dimensional worlds, but to photograph these worlds, the entities that live within and the strange phenomena interacting with us. In this book and throughout the ‘Believe in the Magic series’, I will teach you how the mind interprets your reality and how you can use this information to create the reality or realties you desire. I will continue to inform you about vortices, portals, time slips, the Oz Factor or Dead Zones, alternative realities, frequencies and vibrations. It is my purpose to help you, once again, believe in your own multi-dimensional capabilities and the magic that lies within! |
