| UFO OVER BURLINGTON WISCONSIN burlingtonnews.net 24 X 7 On Demand and Live Streamed Radio Focusing on Earth Mysteries UFOs, Paranormal, Ancient Mysteries, Mysticism , Prophecies...... .541 N. Pine Street Burlington Wi. 53105 262-767-2864 bsutherland@wi.rr.com |
| Did you know that Burlington Wisconsin has been having incredible ufo sightings since July of 2004. Yes...and where are we taking these photos?? Right over the Burlington UFO and Paranormal Center. Following are only a 'few' of the wisconsin ufo photos taken over Burlington. |
| The below photo is totally amazing in the fact not only is there a great orb there and it seems that Jolene is in some sort of beam of light...BUT the large brilliant light that the beam radiates from should not be there! All that is behind the gate that Jolene is leaning up against is a dark deserted utility road..No lights back there what-so-ever. Not only is that strange..but as large and brilliant as that light was..there was absolutely no one in the group that saw this light. Luckily for us the camera did pick it up. Could this be the very thing that is creating the portal in this particular spot. More photos coming today.. EAGLE LAKE...Copyright 2-1-05 @Mary Sutherland |
| Following are some photos we took of this same area. As you will see ....NO LIGHT! Now the question is..where did the light come from. Is it intra-dimensional - Or is a cloaked UFO - Or is it an Angelic Being? |
burlingtonnews@yahoo.com 2/4/2005 2:42:37 AM
I know that a few of you in here know a little of analyzing photos. The photo in http://www.burlingtonnews.net/ufooverburlington14
has me stumped. Any ideas about the light photographed. We were looking right at it, and never saw it.
But look how large and brilliant it is. Could it be an angelic presense.. or is it intra-dimensional or is it ufo??????
mary
From: "Brooks Agnew
Date: Fri Feb 4, 2005 7:30 am
Subject: Re: [ancientmysteriesms] Mary requests help
I took a night ;picture of an old church one time. I thought I would do a time-elapsed shot. i set it up and opened the shutter for about
30 seconds, hoping to get a very clear shot of the stained glass with a dim light behind it from inside the church. When I developed the
film, there was a huge bright light above the church, like a quasar. There was no light at this sight. No street light, no security
light...nothing. I went back there to check it out another night. True, there was no light. To this day I don;t know where that
liight came from.
I believ you are right, Mary. There is cumulative energy vibrating at the right wavelength, but pulsing so fats...or slow...that our minds
don't see it. The film can't miss it though. Maybe we need to learn how to slow our minds down, or speed them up, so we can see
these forces around us. One thing's for sure. That appearance is one of light. That is a good thing. There must be a good reason why so
many light beings are coming to your neighborhood. Maybe they know you have affected the universe, or you are about to. They want
to be
around when it happens.
Dr. Brooks Agnew
arkofamillionyears.com
--------------------------------------
Hi Mary,
There is no logical explanation for the anomalous brilliant light in the top right. As for the spherical image above her head, it appears to
be a double image as the sphere is not spherical but slightly extended. Also the photo shows a double image, as with a
standard film frame. (Mary's Note: We were using 'Digitial' ) But it would be easier to view a much larger image. (Sent Philip the
orginal)
Photography has the ability to pick up (extra)dimensional images the the human retina cannot. Perhaps it is to do with the vibratory
frequency of retinal imaging to the brain?
I have a few photos of anomalous happenings on photos that are clearly other-dimensional to the Earth plain.
Kind regards, Philip Dawes
----------------------------------------
Margaret
Hi Mary,
Is there anything that draws you to those particular spots to take photos? The one that looks like a double exposure is fascinating. It
seems like you have a dimensional photo, (entered into time/space simultaneous framework), since you seem to have got a photo of a
glitch in time and space.
Margaret
Robert Michaels
Date: Thu Feb 3, 2005 2:27 pm
Subject: Re: [abductionbuddies] UFO or Angelic Being??
That's what I was wondering about too, Margaret and Mary. Thats why I was wondering if you had a day-time photo. Please,
though, don't make a special trip up wherever just for me. I know you have other, more pressing and imoprtant things to do.
Robert
Mary Sutherland <burlingtonnews@yahoo.com> wrote:
yes, you guessed it!
There is a time/space distortion there at this particular place. Someone in the area told me about it this summer.
We went up there and have been getting great shots such as this every since. it is a wonderful place..but very mysterious!
Mary
-----------------------------------------------
Hi Mary,
Many thanks. A splendid image size. I save it to my desktop and enlarged it to 1600%. The pixelation of the light source in the top
right appears to be much finer than the rest. Also the spherical object, although not really spherical; it is slightly
iregular, and has a ring of what seems to be fire on its perimeter. It is impossible to determine what it is.
KInd regards,
Philip
-------------------------
Hi Philip
I remembered seeing that light once before in the same area...although not
distinct as the one I earlier sent you.
Terri caught it as she climbed over that gate...Just at the very outside
edge of the camera as it went off accidently.
Then also it seems that it presented a light from its source on the second
photo, after she was back over the fence.
These two photos are of 12-23-05.
NOW..Iam 'thinking' this may be why we get the time/space distortion shots
around this gate.
BUT..is the light a 'result' of the times/space distortion or portal...or is
IT the Portal???? Photos taken by Terri on her digital camera
Mary
---------------------------
Thanks Philip,
I will add this comment to that site.
I should have mentioned...we were using a digital camera to shoot these photos...so we could not have had a double image.
Brooks says that a digital only 'picks up' the photon there. Without the light photon..no picture.
I hope I quoted you right on this Brooks. Mary
-----------------------------
Brooks Agnew"
That's true Mary. Photographic film is sensitive to all kinds of wavelengths, even x-rays and heat. Those we cannot see. Digitall CCD's
are typically electronically filtered to respond ony to limited wavelengths. There are some out there that will pick up infrared,
ultraviolet, and even radio waves, but they are not available at Walmart. The human eye, however is blind to out-of-phase light. We
cannot tell a TV screen is blinking at 40 cycles per second, because the phosphor dope behind the glass retains the electrons frm the
color guns for a fraction of a second. A camera will pick up the blinking action. A computer CRT blinks at 70 cycles per second.
But, what if an energy was out of phase with our sensors or blinking at such a rate that our eyes cannot accumulate it into an image?
Then the CCD would catch it and save it. Thus, Mary is able to capture lights in the sky when no eye saw a light.
Brooks
arkofamillionyears.com
-----------------------------
Thank you so much for that explanation. It really helps and I will put that on the site. We are in a phase now that so many people
'want' to believe, but if we can't show them some rational explanation we will lose them , which will be a tragedy in itself.
Raymond Fowler, one of the fathers of ufology sent me this today. I hope we can all understand the importance of it and work with
science in the search for intra-dimensional possibilities concerning UFO phenomenon. Here is what he sent me:
February 3, 2005 -- When the Journal of the British Interplanetary
Society prints a feature article by credible scientists reporting
that UFOs are in all probability real and deserve serious scientific
study in light of the "New Physics" of the Quantum Kind, then it is
time for science to do so. The space society, founded 72 years ago
in 1933, is composed of prominent space and rocket scientists,
astronomers and astrophysicists, and other science professionals.
The feature article, "Inflation-Theory: Implications for
Extraterrestrial Visitatons," appears in the current BIS "Scientific
Space Journal" on pages 43-50, and was brought to S.P.A.C.E.'s
attention through a feature article on the SPACE.com website by its
Senior Editor Leonard David in "ET Visitors: Scientists See High
Likelihood."
The article's authors are astrophysicist Bernard Haisch (director-
California Institute for Physics and Astrophysics and scentific
editor-Astrophysical Journal"), and three physicist well-known in
Ufology: James Dearoff (Oregon State University professor and
formerly researcher at the National Center for Atmospheric
Research), Harold Puthoff (director-Institute for Advanced Studies
in Austin, Texas) and Bruce Maccabbee (prominent for his research
into UFO photos, films and videos).
They urge scentists to study "high quality" UFO close encounter
reports and to re-examine "the ET hypothesis in light of the new
physics." In doing so, the authors contend that scientists may very
well find "some genuine ET signature within the data." They also
note the discovery by Australian astronomers last year that the
Earth is embedded within a huge "galactic habitable zone" in our
Milky Way Galaxy and that "our world is immersed in a much larger
extraterrestrial civilization," writes Leonard David on Space.com,
and that "gven a billion years advanced physics, might not buzzing
around the galaxy be possible?"
The distinct probablities that "other dimensions (with) habitable
universes adjacent to our own" actually exist, David writes of the
BIS Journal report, makes UFO visitations distinctly posible if not
very likely probable. This is "somewhat of a breakthrough," writes
Haisch in the BIS Journal article. A new book by poplar theortrical
physicist Dr. Michio Kaku, "Parallel Worlds" features te latest New
Physics findings and spectulations.
I know that a few of you in here know a little of analyzing photos. The photo in http://www.burlingtonnews.net/ufooverburlington14
has me stumped. Any ideas about the light photographed. We were looking right at it, and never saw it.
But look how large and brilliant it is. Could it be an angelic presense.. or is it intra-dimensional or is it ufo??????
mary
From: "Brooks Agnew
Date: Fri Feb 4, 2005 7:30 am
Subject: Re: [ancientmysteriesms] Mary requests help
I took a night ;picture of an old church one time. I thought I would do a time-elapsed shot. i set it up and opened the shutter for about
30 seconds, hoping to get a very clear shot of the stained glass with a dim light behind it from inside the church. When I developed the
film, there was a huge bright light above the church, like a quasar. There was no light at this sight. No street light, no security
light...nothing. I went back there to check it out another night. True, there was no light. To this day I don;t know where that
liight came from.
I believ you are right, Mary. There is cumulative energy vibrating at the right wavelength, but pulsing so fats...or slow...that our minds
don't see it. The film can't miss it though. Maybe we need to learn how to slow our minds down, or speed them up, so we can see
these forces around us. One thing's for sure. That appearance is one of light. That is a good thing. There must be a good reason why so
many light beings are coming to your neighborhood. Maybe they know you have affected the universe, or you are about to. They want
to be
around when it happens.
Dr. Brooks Agnew
arkofamillionyears.com
--------------------------------------
Hi Mary,
There is no logical explanation for the anomalous brilliant light in the top right. As for the spherical image above her head, it appears to
be a double image as the sphere is not spherical but slightly extended. Also the photo shows a double image, as with a
standard film frame. (Mary's Note: We were using 'Digitial' ) But it would be easier to view a much larger image. (Sent Philip the
orginal)
Photography has the ability to pick up (extra)dimensional images the the human retina cannot. Perhaps it is to do with the vibratory
frequency of retinal imaging to the brain?
I have a few photos of anomalous happenings on photos that are clearly other-dimensional to the Earth plain.
Kind regards, Philip Dawes
----------------------------------------
Margaret
Hi Mary,
Is there anything that draws you to those particular spots to take photos? The one that looks like a double exposure is fascinating. It
seems like you have a dimensional photo, (entered into time/space simultaneous framework), since you seem to have got a photo of a
glitch in time and space.
Margaret
Robert Michaels
Date: Thu Feb 3, 2005 2:27 pm
Subject: Re: [abductionbuddies] UFO or Angelic Being??
That's what I was wondering about too, Margaret and Mary. Thats why I was wondering if you had a day-time photo. Please,
though, don't make a special trip up wherever just for me. I know you have other, more pressing and imoprtant things to do.
Robert
Mary Sutherland <burlingtonnews@yahoo.com> wrote:
yes, you guessed it!
There is a time/space distortion there at this particular place. Someone in the area told me about it this summer.
We went up there and have been getting great shots such as this every since. it is a wonderful place..but very mysterious!
Mary
-----------------------------------------------
Hi Mary,
Many thanks. A splendid image size. I save it to my desktop and enlarged it to 1600%. The pixelation of the light source in the top
right appears to be much finer than the rest. Also the spherical object, although not really spherical; it is slightly
iregular, and has a ring of what seems to be fire on its perimeter. It is impossible to determine what it is.
KInd regards,
Philip
-------------------------
Hi Philip
I remembered seeing that light once before in the same area...although not
distinct as the one I earlier sent you.
Terri caught it as she climbed over that gate...Just at the very outside
edge of the camera as it went off accidently.
Then also it seems that it presented a light from its source on the second
photo, after she was back over the fence.
These two photos are of 12-23-05.
NOW..Iam 'thinking' this may be why we get the time/space distortion shots
around this gate.
BUT..is the light a 'result' of the times/space distortion or portal...or is
IT the Portal???? Photos taken by Terri on her digital camera
Mary
---------------------------
Thanks Philip,
I will add this comment to that site.
I should have mentioned...we were using a digital camera to shoot these photos...so we could not have had a double image.
Brooks says that a digital only 'picks up' the photon there. Without the light photon..no picture.
I hope I quoted you right on this Brooks. Mary
-----------------------------
Brooks Agnew"
That's true Mary. Photographic film is sensitive to all kinds of wavelengths, even x-rays and heat. Those we cannot see. Digitall CCD's
are typically electronically filtered to respond ony to limited wavelengths. There are some out there that will pick up infrared,
ultraviolet, and even radio waves, but they are not available at Walmart. The human eye, however is blind to out-of-phase light. We
cannot tell a TV screen is blinking at 40 cycles per second, because the phosphor dope behind the glass retains the electrons frm the
color guns for a fraction of a second. A camera will pick up the blinking action. A computer CRT blinks at 70 cycles per second.
But, what if an energy was out of phase with our sensors or blinking at such a rate that our eyes cannot accumulate it into an image?
Then the CCD would catch it and save it. Thus, Mary is able to capture lights in the sky when no eye saw a light.
Brooks
arkofamillionyears.com
-----------------------------
Thank you so much for that explanation. It really helps and I will put that on the site. We are in a phase now that so many people
'want' to believe, but if we can't show them some rational explanation we will lose them , which will be a tragedy in itself.
Raymond Fowler, one of the fathers of ufology sent me this today. I hope we can all understand the importance of it and work with
science in the search for intra-dimensional possibilities concerning UFO phenomenon. Here is what he sent me:
February 3, 2005 -- When the Journal of the British Interplanetary
Society prints a feature article by credible scientists reporting
that UFOs are in all probability real and deserve serious scientific
study in light of the "New Physics" of the Quantum Kind, then it is
time for science to do so. The space society, founded 72 years ago
in 1933, is composed of prominent space and rocket scientists,
astronomers and astrophysicists, and other science professionals.
The feature article, "Inflation-Theory: Implications for
Extraterrestrial Visitatons," appears in the current BIS "Scientific
Space Journal" on pages 43-50, and was brought to S.P.A.C.E.'s
attention through a feature article on the SPACE.com website by its
Senior Editor Leonard David in "ET Visitors: Scientists See High
Likelihood."
The article's authors are astrophysicist Bernard Haisch (director-
California Institute for Physics and Astrophysics and scentific
editor-Astrophysical Journal"), and three physicist well-known in
Ufology: James Dearoff (Oregon State University professor and
formerly researcher at the National Center for Atmospheric
Research), Harold Puthoff (director-Institute for Advanced Studies
in Austin, Texas) and Bruce Maccabbee (prominent for his research
into UFO photos, films and videos).
They urge scentists to study "high quality" UFO close encounter
reports and to re-examine "the ET hypothesis in light of the new
physics." In doing so, the authors contend that scientists may very
well find "some genuine ET signature within the data." They also
note the discovery by Australian astronomers last year that the
Earth is embedded within a huge "galactic habitable zone" in our
Milky Way Galaxy and that "our world is immersed in a much larger
extraterrestrial civilization," writes Leonard David on Space.com,
and that "gven a billion years advanced physics, might not buzzing
around the galaxy be possible?"
The distinct probablities that "other dimensions (with) habitable
universes adjacent to our own" actually exist, David writes of the
BIS Journal report, makes UFO visitations distinctly posible if not
very likely probable. This is "somewhat of a breakthrough," writes
Haisch in the BIS Journal article. A new book by poplar theortrical
physicist Dr. Michio Kaku, "Parallel Worlds" features te latest New
Physics findings and spectulations.
The photo to the left is a
shot that Terri was able to
get on her digital camera,
as she was climbing over
the gate. Her camera shot
off up into the
sky..fortunately for us
Photo taken 12-23-04
At first we put this photo
aside..until we got the
photo in from the other
night. Now we realize
there is a connection to
this light and the
intra-dimensional portal
next to the gate at Eagle
Lake. What the connection
is ..as of yet...we do not
know.
.
As soon as Terri climbed
over the gate she
'immediately' shot a photo
of Cheryl..notice the rays
of the brilliant light can be
seen coming from the top
left side of the photo..in
the same location as the
light photo above it.
shot that Terri was able to
get on her digital camera,
as she was climbing over
the gate. Her camera shot
off up into the
sky..fortunately for us
Photo taken 12-23-04
At first we put this photo
aside..until we got the
photo in from the other
night. Now we realize
there is a connection to
this light and the
intra-dimensional portal
next to the gate at Eagle
Lake. What the connection
is ..as of yet...we do not
know.
.
As soon as Terri climbed
over the gate she
'immediately' shot a photo
of Cheryl..notice the rays
of the brilliant light can be
seen coming from the top
left side of the photo..in
the same location as the
light photo above it.
