UFO OVER BURLINGTON WISCONSIN
burlingtonnews.net
24 X 7 On Demand and Live Streamed Radio
Focusing on Earth Mysteries
UFOs, Paranormal, Ancient Mysteries, Mysticism , Prophecies......
.532 N. Pine Street Burlington Wi. 53105 262-767-1116 bsutherland@wi.rr.com
burlingtonnews.net
24 X 7 On Demand and Live Streamed Radio
Focusing on Earth Mysteries
UFOs, Paranormal, Ancient Mysteries, Mysticism , Prophecies......
.532 N. Pine Street Burlington Wi. 53105 262-767-1116 bsutherland@wi.rr.com
ARE WE BEING PROBED????
Many times, we have experienced and have had witnesses
come into our office experiencing what seems to be
intelligent communication with the ufo over Burlington. We
will send a telepathic message to it and it will move or flash
lights. We and others have experienced the ufo actually
following the vehicle in which we or the witnesses are in.
How can this be? I was at a loss except to just to believe in
the fact it was completely 'telepathic' ---Up until Now.
Thanks to Bruce Cornet Ph.D
ET Robotic Probe or Transient Prosaic Reflection?
caught on camera
by Bruce Cornet, Ph.D
Due to the importance of B.C's site I am going to mirror it
here. I have watched too many sites get dropped and
valuable information forever lost. However I give all this credit
to Bruce and his wonderful work and refer to readers his site
at above 'Thanks to Bruce Cornet 'Link .
Many times, we have experienced and have had witnesses
come into our office experiencing what seems to be
intelligent communication with the ufo over Burlington. We
will send a telepathic message to it and it will move or flash
lights. We and others have experienced the ufo actually
following the vehicle in which we or the witnesses are in.
How can this be? I was at a loss except to just to believe in
the fact it was completely 'telepathic' ---Up until Now.
Thanks to Bruce Cornet Ph.D
ET Robotic Probe or Transient Prosaic Reflection?
caught on camera
by Bruce Cornet, Ph.D
Due to the importance of B.C's site I am going to mirror it
here. I have watched too many sites get dropped and
valuable information forever lost. However I give all this credit
to Bruce and his wonderful work and refer to readers his site
at above 'Thanks to Bruce Cornet 'Link .
| We used to laugh over the matter of what we called ' Brad's Lightning Bolt' Experience when we went to Eagle Lake one night. The joke was that the strange bolt of light was some kind of probe scanning his brain to find out what was in there...and of course they found nothing.. (remember it was a joke..smiles) Then something rather strange happened. Brad was the only one that had that experience with the bolt of light into his forehead. And he never went back to Eagle Lake after that evening. Now if you notice in the photo Brad has 'premature' gray hair. Almost six months later, I took some people up to the lake on our tour - one of the gentleman had gray hair. This was the first 'gray haired' man since Brad that had been up there with us. And guess what - He got zapped with another bolt of light right into the forehead! Now we began to think -maybe whoever or whatever that was - thought the second gentleman was Brad due to the color of hair. Coincidence - maybe...but then again ..maybe not. 2nd gentleman that was taken to Eagle Lake. |
THE PROBE OF THEIR CAR
If this was a vehicle piloted by non-humans studying the
Earth, how might they have been able to monitor Cornet and
Fischer from that distance and know what we were doing?
How would the pilot be able to keep "his" vehicle moving at
the same relative speed as the car from the perspective of
the occupants in the car? In other words, how was the pilot
able to pace our car?
When reviewing the videotape the light cast from a street
lamp momentarily illuminated an object just in front of the
windshield near the roof. That lamp can be seen at the end
of the animation. The object then disappeared or became
invisible. It is clearly behind the rear view mirror, because
the left edge of the mirror obscures the right edge of the
object.
By why couldn't the object merely be a reflection of
something off the dashboard or in the car? Why does it have
to be an ET probe?
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Videotape: 8mm, recorded on a Sony Handycam video Hi8,
model CCD-TRV81 (3-971-670-0).
Vehicle: 1999 Chevy Impala sedan, dark green exterior, dark
gray interior.
Image or reflection under investigation
For any good investigation, all possibilities must be
explored. Winshields and car window glass are notorious
for reflecting images, both from outside the car and inside it.
But for images to be seen, the observer has to be at the right
angle to catch the reflected light. Otherwise the reflection will
not be visible to that observer. In order to test whether or not
something in or on the car was briefly imaged on the
windshield as the street light reflected off of it, Cornet went to
a Chevy dealership and examined a new Impala. Although
the Impala was a 2000 year model, only the tail lights had
been modified from a 1999 model. The features of interest,
such as the dashboard design, windshield, air intake ducts
for the heating and cooling systems, and windshield wipers,
were the same as those on a 1999 Impala.
View of Impala windshield, air intake duct with grating, and
elongate defrost vent on dashboard with a grating which has
cross slats spaced far apart. None of these features
resemble what was imaged in the video.
View of windshield tinting (top) and image distortion along
the left side of the windshield (note building brick pattern just
below rear view mirror).
View of left-side side air control vents, which are situated
below rim or lip of dashboard, and not in a position to be
imaged by reflection off the windshield.
View of dashboard to show contours and lip which would
prevent any duct gratings on this face from being imaged on
windshield
View of sun visors from the side that faces window when
they are turned down. Nothing on that side resembles what
was imaged in the video.
View of windshield from angle the video was taken, showing
sun visor and rear view mirror in approximately the same
positions as in video. The visor was turned more clockwise
and more viewed from the side in the video. Note position of
side view mirror which reflected a light in video
Another slightly more angled view of windshield from
passenger's side. Light on rear view mirror goes out when
door is closed
Back To The Strange Object
In between the visor and mirror a strange object became
visible during four frames on the video as the street light
caught it at a certain angle. As the street light moved
towards the car, the illumination faded rapidly and the object
seems to become invisible. Either that or the object was a
reflection from something outside the car. But for it to be
imaged like that, the object had to be close to the car and
distinct from other objects surrounding it (otherwise they
would have been visible also). Note that it is imaged on or
through the tinted part of the windshield, making visibility
even more dependent on bright illumination or bright
reflection.
Watch the animated gif to your right and then review the still
frames of the object. The images used in the animation
were cropped in order to keep the size of the animated gif as
small as possible without losing resolution (263K).
Note the height of the telephone pole as it passed the
camera. It gives a good reference to where the top of the
windshield is located. The positions of the sun visor and
rear view mirror also frame the extent of unobstructed
visibility through the windshield. There was nothing on the
roadside which could have produced such a shape. There
was nothing inside the car which could have produced a
reflection or mirage like that. During the four frames the
object is visible, it moves with the car, thereby eliminating a
stationary object outside. Between the second and third
frames in the animation, Herm moved the sun visor over his
seat forward so that he could have a better view through the
windshield. At the moment the visor was moved forward, the
device became visible.
Original video frame containing the best image
Discussion
The following discussion concludes that nothing on the car
caused the image recorded on the video. Instead, the
remote possibility that this was some sort of robotic probe
associated with the AOP will be examined. Remotely -
controlled probes are occasionally recorded in association
with AOP (e.g. 2 June 1993).
The anomalous object has a definite shape: It is elongate
with curved sides, has what appear to be sensor or
antenna-like projections coming off the bottom and top, and
has a rectangular area containing what look like louvers or a
grating across it. No cross slats are visible, however - in
distinct contrast to vents on the car, and the spacing of the
slats is too close for this to be an image of an air control
grating on the car. Beyond that description nothing more can
be said about this device, except that it appears solid and
constructed, and not a reflection. ----------------------------------
>>>
The method of propulsion which enables a device or probe
to hover just outside the car windshield and move with the
car is unknown but certainly of great interest. We heard no
sound coming from that area of the windshield. If the
louvers were directional slats used to direct airflow, we
heard no sound above the drone of the car engine.
This device or probe would have allowed the pilot to monitor
us closely with a camera, possibly overhear our
conversation, as well as gauge our speed and orientation
relative to the AOP so that it could appear to pace our car.
The U.S. military has already developed various types of
small remotely - controlled robotic flying devices containing
cameras. One particular device, called the Black Widow,
was featured in the September 1999 issue of Discover
magazine.
Such a probe could have kept pace with our car, but it is
unlikely that it could have done so that close to our
windshield without occasionally bumping into it and making
its presence known.
Reason For Suspecting A Probe
Without any reason to suspect a probe, any speculation that
the anomaly might have been a probe would only be fantasy
until all alternative explanations could be eliminated. On 11
October 1994 Cornet was paced along the Garden State
Parkway by two AOP, one of which stayed with him for 72
miles from the Atlantic City exit to Red Bank, NJ (see The
Escort). Cornet had just given a program (hosted by George
Filer, regional Director of MUFON) on public access
television in Atlantic City on his Pine Bush research. During
the trip back to Red Bank, Cornet had what he thought were
telepathic conversations with someone, who he thought was
the pilot of the object on his right. When the two lights first
came up to the edge of the parkway, one on each side of him
as he got onto the parkway, he received a distinctive
telepathic hail: Something like, "Hi! We saw your show and
we liked what you had to say."
Whether or not he really had telepathic conversations with
one or more of the occupants cannot be proven. Skeptics
would call his account anecdotal, and most would probably
dismiss it as a product of a vivid imagination. However,
during the trip the conversation became humorous when
Cornet thought, "I wonder what it is like to fly one of those
things." He got an immediate thought back: "What is it like to
drive a car?" Then Cornet picked up the thought, "You must
have a problem refueling," implying that the pilot did not have
such problems (was this humor in reply?). Realizing that he
might be in mental contact with another intelligence, Cornet
took a chance. He focussed his mind on driving, looking at
the road, looking at the steering wheel and foot pedals,
looking at the dashboard and instruments, and thinking that
this is what it is like to drive a car (or truck). What he got
back surprised him. The pilot's response was immediate.
For a moment (not long enough for him to lose control of his
truck), Cornet saw in his own mind what the pilot saw on the
craft. When he got home he sat down and drew what he
remembered seeing. As he drew, what appeared on paper
surprised him even more, because it was as if his brain had
recorded more than he remembered seeing in that instant.
If this was his own creative imagination at work, it was
spectacular and detailed, he thought. If this was a projected
image given to him by the pilot, it was extraordinary!
When dealing with human memory, we have no way of
confirming its reality without some other record which would
verify the information in that memory. We have no technology
or medical capability yet to probe the human brain in order to
find out where a particular piece of information is stored,
where specific visual data is stored, how it is stored, and
how those data were created, accessed, and/or recorded by
the brain. Therefore, when dealing with human thoughts and
memory, there is always the chance of confabulation or
intentional distortion, either by the individual who possesses
that memory or by whoever caused that memory or vision to
be created in the first place.
What does this have to do with the anomaly imaged in the
video? Everything.
Look at the drawing Cornet drew and tell me what you see
(The Escort vision or drawing). bcornet@monmouth.com
How was it possible for the pilot to have a close up image of
Cornet driving his truck? The right view screen shows a
panoramic view of the landscape and highway from the
vantage point of the AOP. But the left screen shows a close
up of Cornet and his truck.
Something had to be following the truck closely for this vision
to be accurate. That is why Cornet suspected that the
anomaly in the video was a fortuitous glimpse of the type of
device which enabled the Garden State Parkway pacer to
view Cornet so closely on his viewscreen. Is Cornet correct?
You be the judge. It is because of that event that Cornet
thought "probe" when he first saw the anomaly. He had to
discipline himself to look for other alternative explanations in
order to overcome his personal bias.
Conclusion
Was the anomaly a prosaic and mundane reflection off the
windshield of something in the immediate surroundings, or
was it a chance glimpse at a robotic probe? Without
information about what could have been imaged at the
location the video was taken, any conclusion on the part of
the author is at least partly subjective. Without examining an
Impala, the possibility of reflection from something in or on
the car could not be eliminated. Whatever it was, it can be
concluded that it was not part of the car, but something
outside and close to the car. It was not dirt on the
windshield, because that would have been noticed before by
one or both of the car's occupants (in addition, rental cars
are usually inspected and sent out with clean windshields).
If that object was connected to the AOP, it is extremely
fortunate to have gotten a picture of it. Such information
could tell us a lot about how AOP technology might work and
who might be behind it. Note the human hand on a joystick
in Cornet's vision (The Escort vision or drawing). If Cornet
had made up this vision in his imagination, why depict a
human hand or joystick? --------------------- >>>>>>>>>
If this was a vehicle piloted by non-humans studying the
Earth, how might they have been able to monitor Cornet and
Fischer from that distance and know what we were doing?
How would the pilot be able to keep "his" vehicle moving at
the same relative speed as the car from the perspective of
the occupants in the car? In other words, how was the pilot
able to pace our car?
When reviewing the videotape the light cast from a street
lamp momentarily illuminated an object just in front of the
windshield near the roof. That lamp can be seen at the end
of the animation. The object then disappeared or became
invisible. It is clearly behind the rear view mirror, because
the left edge of the mirror obscures the right edge of the
object.
By why couldn't the object merely be a reflection of
something off the dashboard or in the car? Why does it have
to be an ET probe?
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Videotape: 8mm, recorded on a Sony Handycam video Hi8,
model CCD-TRV81 (3-971-670-0).
Vehicle: 1999 Chevy Impala sedan, dark green exterior, dark
gray interior.
Image or reflection under investigation
For any good investigation, all possibilities must be
explored. Winshields and car window glass are notorious
for reflecting images, both from outside the car and inside it.
But for images to be seen, the observer has to be at the right
angle to catch the reflected light. Otherwise the reflection will
not be visible to that observer. In order to test whether or not
something in or on the car was briefly imaged on the
windshield as the street light reflected off of it, Cornet went to
a Chevy dealership and examined a new Impala. Although
the Impala was a 2000 year model, only the tail lights had
been modified from a 1999 model. The features of interest,
such as the dashboard design, windshield, air intake ducts
for the heating and cooling systems, and windshield wipers,
were the same as those on a 1999 Impala.
View of Impala windshield, air intake duct with grating, and
elongate defrost vent on dashboard with a grating which has
cross slats spaced far apart. None of these features
resemble what was imaged in the video.
View of windshield tinting (top) and image distortion along
the left side of the windshield (note building brick pattern just
below rear view mirror).
View of left-side side air control vents, which are situated
below rim or lip of dashboard, and not in a position to be
imaged by reflection off the windshield.
View of dashboard to show contours and lip which would
prevent any duct gratings on this face from being imaged on
windshield
View of sun visors from the side that faces window when
they are turned down. Nothing on that side resembles what
was imaged in the video.
View of windshield from angle the video was taken, showing
sun visor and rear view mirror in approximately the same
positions as in video. The visor was turned more clockwise
and more viewed from the side in the video. Note position of
side view mirror which reflected a light in video
Another slightly more angled view of windshield from
passenger's side. Light on rear view mirror goes out when
door is closed
Back To The Strange Object
In between the visor and mirror a strange object became
visible during four frames on the video as the street light
caught it at a certain angle. As the street light moved
towards the car, the illumination faded rapidly and the object
seems to become invisible. Either that or the object was a
reflection from something outside the car. But for it to be
imaged like that, the object had to be close to the car and
distinct from other objects surrounding it (otherwise they
would have been visible also). Note that it is imaged on or
through the tinted part of the windshield, making visibility
even more dependent on bright illumination or bright
reflection.
Watch the animated gif to your right and then review the still
frames of the object. The images used in the animation
were cropped in order to keep the size of the animated gif as
small as possible without losing resolution (263K).
Note the height of the telephone pole as it passed the
camera. It gives a good reference to where the top of the
windshield is located. The positions of the sun visor and
rear view mirror also frame the extent of unobstructed
visibility through the windshield. There was nothing on the
roadside which could have produced such a shape. There
was nothing inside the car which could have produced a
reflection or mirage like that. During the four frames the
object is visible, it moves with the car, thereby eliminating a
stationary object outside. Between the second and third
frames in the animation, Herm moved the sun visor over his
seat forward so that he could have a better view through the
windshield. At the moment the visor was moved forward, the
device became visible.
Original video frame containing the best image
Discussion
The following discussion concludes that nothing on the car
caused the image recorded on the video. Instead, the
remote possibility that this was some sort of robotic probe
associated with the AOP will be examined. Remotely -
controlled probes are occasionally recorded in association
with AOP (e.g. 2 June 1993).
The anomalous object has a definite shape: It is elongate
with curved sides, has what appear to be sensor or
antenna-like projections coming off the bottom and top, and
has a rectangular area containing what look like louvers or a
grating across it. No cross slats are visible, however - in
distinct contrast to vents on the car, and the spacing of the
slats is too close for this to be an image of an air control
grating on the car. Beyond that description nothing more can
be said about this device, except that it appears solid and
constructed, and not a reflection. ----------------------------------
>>>
The method of propulsion which enables a device or probe
to hover just outside the car windshield and move with the
car is unknown but certainly of great interest. We heard no
sound coming from that area of the windshield. If the
louvers were directional slats used to direct airflow, we
heard no sound above the drone of the car engine.
This device or probe would have allowed the pilot to monitor
us closely with a camera, possibly overhear our
conversation, as well as gauge our speed and orientation
relative to the AOP so that it could appear to pace our car.
The U.S. military has already developed various types of
small remotely - controlled robotic flying devices containing
cameras. One particular device, called the Black Widow,
was featured in the September 1999 issue of Discover
magazine.
Such a probe could have kept pace with our car, but it is
unlikely that it could have done so that close to our
windshield without occasionally bumping into it and making
its presence known.
Reason For Suspecting A Probe
Without any reason to suspect a probe, any speculation that
the anomaly might have been a probe would only be fantasy
until all alternative explanations could be eliminated. On 11
October 1994 Cornet was paced along the Garden State
Parkway by two AOP, one of which stayed with him for 72
miles from the Atlantic City exit to Red Bank, NJ (see The
Escort). Cornet had just given a program (hosted by George
Filer, regional Director of MUFON) on public access
television in Atlantic City on his Pine Bush research. During
the trip back to Red Bank, Cornet had what he thought were
telepathic conversations with someone, who he thought was
the pilot of the object on his right. When the two lights first
came up to the edge of the parkway, one on each side of him
as he got onto the parkway, he received a distinctive
telepathic hail: Something like, "Hi! We saw your show and
we liked what you had to say."
Whether or not he really had telepathic conversations with
one or more of the occupants cannot be proven. Skeptics
would call his account anecdotal, and most would probably
dismiss it as a product of a vivid imagination. However,
during the trip the conversation became humorous when
Cornet thought, "I wonder what it is like to fly one of those
things." He got an immediate thought back: "What is it like to
drive a car?" Then Cornet picked up the thought, "You must
have a problem refueling," implying that the pilot did not have
such problems (was this humor in reply?). Realizing that he
might be in mental contact with another intelligence, Cornet
took a chance. He focussed his mind on driving, looking at
the road, looking at the steering wheel and foot pedals,
looking at the dashboard and instruments, and thinking that
this is what it is like to drive a car (or truck). What he got
back surprised him. The pilot's response was immediate.
For a moment (not long enough for him to lose control of his
truck), Cornet saw in his own mind what the pilot saw on the
craft. When he got home he sat down and drew what he
remembered seeing. As he drew, what appeared on paper
surprised him even more, because it was as if his brain had
recorded more than he remembered seeing in that instant.
If this was his own creative imagination at work, it was
spectacular and detailed, he thought. If this was a projected
image given to him by the pilot, it was extraordinary!
When dealing with human memory, we have no way of
confirming its reality without some other record which would
verify the information in that memory. We have no technology
or medical capability yet to probe the human brain in order to
find out where a particular piece of information is stored,
where specific visual data is stored, how it is stored, and
how those data were created, accessed, and/or recorded by
the brain. Therefore, when dealing with human thoughts and
memory, there is always the chance of confabulation or
intentional distortion, either by the individual who possesses
that memory or by whoever caused that memory or vision to
be created in the first place.
What does this have to do with the anomaly imaged in the
video? Everything.
Look at the drawing Cornet drew and tell me what you see
(The Escort vision or drawing). bcornet@monmouth.com
How was it possible for the pilot to have a close up image of
Cornet driving his truck? The right view screen shows a
panoramic view of the landscape and highway from the
vantage point of the AOP. But the left screen shows a close
up of Cornet and his truck.
Something had to be following the truck closely for this vision
to be accurate. That is why Cornet suspected that the
anomaly in the video was a fortuitous glimpse of the type of
device which enabled the Garden State Parkway pacer to
view Cornet so closely on his viewscreen. Is Cornet correct?
You be the judge. It is because of that event that Cornet
thought "probe" when he first saw the anomaly. He had to
discipline himself to look for other alternative explanations in
order to overcome his personal bias.
Conclusion
Was the anomaly a prosaic and mundane reflection off the
windshield of something in the immediate surroundings, or
was it a chance glimpse at a robotic probe? Without
information about what could have been imaged at the
location the video was taken, any conclusion on the part of
the author is at least partly subjective. Without examining an
Impala, the possibility of reflection from something in or on
the car could not be eliminated. Whatever it was, it can be
concluded that it was not part of the car, but something
outside and close to the car. It was not dirt on the
windshield, because that would have been noticed before by
one or both of the car's occupants (in addition, rental cars
are usually inspected and sent out with clean windshields).
If that object was connected to the AOP, it is extremely
fortunate to have gotten a picture of it. Such information
could tell us a lot about how AOP technology might work and
who might be behind it. Note the human hand on a joystick
in Cornet's vision (The Escort vision or drawing). If Cornet
had made up this vision in his imagination, why depict a
human hand or joystick? --------------------- >>>>>>>>>
While shooting three ufos off J over Bong Recreational Park,(Above photo) this woman became
frightened and decided to go home. BUT..as she headed for home, she realized that the ufos
were following her. She continued to keep shooting the ufos as she went home. Then went into
her house to get her camcorder.
When she came out of her house one of the ufos was sitting up in the sky parallel to her home, as
if observing her.
Did they know that she was photographing them - and was curious as to who she was and where
she was going - or were they letting her know that they already knew what she was up to. Was she
Probed? Following are some photos she took as she was going home .
December 23, 2004, a group of us had a ufo sighting over by Eagle Lake. The ufo came down out
of the sky. We actually thought it was going to hit us. Just before it got on us, it turned quickly
upwards and went up above the clouds. I quickly grabbed the camera and shot towards the
direction of the ufo.
Although the ufo is not visible you can see the light phenomenon and many orbs with the sky a
reddish tint.
Photo below . The car load of people behind us, said that it felt like they were in some sort of
vacuum. They said all sound had stopped, such as no tire sounds on the road. They said it
almost felt like they were floating above the road. We were in front and didn't notice that of course -
we were too busy screaming, thinking the ufo was going to crash down on us.
frightened and decided to go home. BUT..as she headed for home, she realized that the ufos
were following her. She continued to keep shooting the ufos as she went home. Then went into
her house to get her camcorder.
When she came out of her house one of the ufos was sitting up in the sky parallel to her home, as
if observing her.
Did they know that she was photographing them - and was curious as to who she was and where
she was going - or were they letting her know that they already knew what she was up to. Was she
Probed? Following are some photos she took as she was going home .
December 23, 2004, a group of us had a ufo sighting over by Eagle Lake. The ufo came down out
of the sky. We actually thought it was going to hit us. Just before it got on us, it turned quickly
upwards and went up above the clouds. I quickly grabbed the camera and shot towards the
direction of the ufo.
Although the ufo is not visible you can see the light phenomenon and many orbs with the sky a
reddish tint.
Photo below . The car load of people behind us, said that it felt like they were in some sort of
vacuum. They said all sound had stopped, such as no tire sounds on the road. They said it
almost felt like they were floating above the road. We were in front and didn't notice that of course -
we were too busy screaming, thinking the ufo was going to crash down on us.
| This Photo taken by lady at Eagle lake Looks quite similar to above left photo at Dannes Farm |
| BURLINGTON SACRED SITE TOURS "Experience the Burlington Vortex!" "One of the Strongest Vortices in the World" BURLINGTON HAUNTED TOURS BURLINGTON SACRED SITE TOURS BURLINGTON HISTORICAL TOURS BURLINGTON TOURS 532 N. PINE STREET BURLINGTON, WISCONSIN 262 767 1116 bsutherland@wi.rr.com |
| ANNUAL BURLINGTON VORTEX CONFERENCE OCT 30TH - NOVEMBER 2ND Visit us every year at the Burlington Vortex conference in Burlington Wi UFO- PARANORMAL- ANCIENT RACES- METAPHYSICAL-UNDERGROUND TUNNELS CONFERENCE INFO |